Injected
HGH on the other hand is an "exogenous
hormone." Exogenous hormones come
into the body from the outside and can cause
a world of problems.
The
problems stem from the fact that your body
cannot control them. All the body can do to
counteract the incoming hormone is decrease
or shut-off internal (endogenous) production
of the hormone.
If
there is still too much hormone floating around
around after the body shuts-off internal production,
a very unhealthy situation exists.
Essentially, you bypass all you body's finely
tuned control mechanisms and you can upset
your entire endocrine system, with potentially
grave consequences.
Molecular
(injected) HGH is often used with children who
are growth hormone deficient and have growth
failure.
HGH
treatment has been used for children with Turner
syndrome (only affects girls), Prader-Willi
syndrome (PWS) and pre-pubertal children with
chronic renal insufficiency that is supported
by height measurements, biochemical and radiological
tests.
Why
does every HGH Web site offer the exact same
benefits?
99% of the HGH Web sites regardless of the type
of HGH they are selling use the benefits derived
from clinical studies on molecular injected
HGH.
Just
because someone "says" their product
delivers equal benefits as reflected in the
injected clinical studies does not mean that
it will.
Reality:
All
of the "landmark" studies on
molecular injected HGH used pharmacological
doses of HGH.
Pharmacological
in the sense that the doses in the studies
far exceeded the body's own natural
levels of HGH.
For
example: Dr. Daniel Rudmans now famous and
and heavily referenced clinical study on molecular
injected HGH used pharmacological doses of HGH.
Yes,
the subjects did get tremendous benefits - however
- what is not written anywhere on the Internet
is that over 50% of the people involved in
the study dropped out because of side effects.
Just
as long as you understand the difference
between exogenous hormones and endogenous
hormones. As well as the difference between
pharmacological and physiological doses.
A
deeper explanation is beyond the scope of
this material, however, I'll give you a
brief overview.
Exogenous
hormones come into the body from the outside.
Injected HGH is an example of an exogenous
hormone (estrogen for women). The challenge
with exogenous hormones stem from the fact
that your body cannot control them.
Your
body simply cannot make the hormone jump
back into the needle.
All
your body can do to counteract the incoming
hormone is decrease or shut-off internal
(endogenous) production of that particular
hormone.
This
natural counterregulatory mechanism is called
a feedback loop.
If
there is still too much hormone floating
around after the body shuts-off internal
production, a very unhealthy situation exists.
In addition, no matter how carefully an
exogenous hormone is administered, it cannot
precisely mimic the subtle balance of naturally
produced hormones.
Your
body is extremely sensitive to hormonal
fluctuations.
As
long as your body is in control, there is
no problem. But when you bypass all your
body's control mechanisms; you upset the
entire endocrine system, which has some
potentially grave consequences.
Does
homeopathic HGH even work?
Given the explanation above it is easy to
see that we have to re-think HGH
therapy.
The
goal of the homeopathic formula I sell on
this site is to put your body in control
of it's own (endogenous) HGH production.
While
there is great confusion about homeopathic
medicines one fact remains - it works. And
is demonstrated in the independent studies
conducted on our product.
The
Actual HGH molecule is too large to be absorbed
sublingually (under the tongue). Homeopathy does not attempt to have
the actual large HGH molecule be absorbed
sublingually (under the tongue).
The
real HGH molecules and the base solution
are subjected to a long and intense process
of homeopathic succussion and dilution.
This
process combines today's advanced molecular
biotechnolgy, homeopathic preparation and
bioelectric medicine to create a base solution
that is potentiated with the properties
and characteristics of the original active
ingredient (human growth hormone).
Through
the use of homeopathic formulation the base
solution has been energized and has taken
on the properties and abilities of the original
active ingredient (human growth hormone).
Essentially becoming a homeopathic signaling
molecule.
These
signaling molecules help to reestablish
the cell-to-cell communication in the hormonal
system through specific pathways...cell
receptor sites.
All
our HGH has to do in order to get your body
working properly on it's own is to signal
these receptor sites and that's exactly
what it does.
What
Evidence is There That Homeopathy Works?
Homeopathy has a two hundred-year track
record of curing illness. It first came
to widespread public attention through its
effectiveness in curing epidemics of cholera
in the 19th century.
During
the great influenza epidemic after World
War I, homeopathic hospitals reported very
low death rates, while hospitals employing
conventional medicine reported death rates
of 20% to 30%.
Since
World War II, the double blind clinical
trial has become the "gold standard"
for determining the effectiveness of medical
treatment. A number of double blind trials
have been done on the use of homeopathy
on a number of medical conditions. Although
not every study has shown a positive outcome,
the majority of studies have shown that
homeopathy is effective.
Our
formula has had an independent double blind
placebo controlled clinical study, most
other products on the market have not.
Three
meta-analyses of clinical trials of homeopathy
have been done in the last decade and all
have reached the same conclusion: homeopathy
is an effective system of medical treatment.
The
most recent study was published in the September
20, 1997 issue of Lancet. This study, conducted
by Dr. Wayne Jonas, head of the Office of
Alternative medicine, and Dr. Klaus Linde,
concluded that when the evidence of the
89 studies of homeopathy judged to be of
good quality was pooled, homeopathy was
2.45 times more effective than placebo.
The
Homeopathic Medicine Research Group, formed
by the European Union to determine the effectiveness
of homeopathy conducted another study in
1996. This study is notable in that skeptics
of homeopathy were involved in its design.
The study pooled results from 17 clinical
trials involving 2,001 patients and found
that homeopathy was more effective than
placebo with a 0.027% probability that this
result was due to chance.
Unfortunately,
this study has not been published in a medical
journal, so it is not readily available.
The
third meta-analysis was published in the
February 9, 1991 issue of the British Medical
Journal. It was performed by two Dutch researchers,
who were asked to assess the efficacy of
various forms of alternative medicine. Although
they were skeptics of homeopathy and alternative
medicine generally, they reported. "The
amount of positive results came as a surprise
to us." and, "The evidence presented
in this review would probably be sufficient
for establishing homeopathy as a regular
treatment for certain indications."
